Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 01:46
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is a fun psychological trick to try on someone?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How can a small local business with no marketing budget use social media to attract more customers?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Could This Diet Be the Key to Preventing Alzheimer's and Dementia? - bestlifeonline.com
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What shocking family behavior did you read about in India?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Tomato Recall Escalates to Highest Health Risk Alert—Here’s What You Need to Know - Real Simple
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What was your embarrassing moment in front of your father-in-law as an Indian daughter-in-law?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.